From Covariation to Causation: A Causal Power Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
Because causal relations are neither observable nor deducible, they must be induced from observable events. The 2 dominant approaches to the psychology of causal induction—the covariation approach and the causal power approach—are each crippled by fundamental problems. This article proposes an integration of these approaches thai overcomes these problems. The proposal is that reasoners innately treat the relation between covariation (a function denned in terms of observable events) and causal power (an unobservable entity) as that between scientists' law or model and their theory explaining the model. This solution is formalized in the power PC theory, a causal power theory of the probabilistic contrast model (P. W. Cheng & L. R. Novick, 1990). The article reviews diverse old and new empirical tests discriminating this theory from previous models, none of which is justified by a theory. The results uniquely support the power PC theory.
منابع مشابه
From covariation to causation: a test of the assumption of causal power.
How humans infer causation from covariation has been the subject of a vigorous debate, most recently between the computational causal power account (P. W. Cheng, 1997) and associative learning theorists (e.g., K. Lober & D. R. Shanks, 2000). Whereas most researchers in the subject area agree that causal power as computed by the power PC theory offers a normative account of the inductive process...
متن کاملInterpreting Covariation in Causal Structure Learning
Recent studies have shown that people use covariation information to infer causal structure. However, there is little information about how people derive causal directionality from covariation. The present study is designed to provide further evidence about the role of covariation in causal structure learning. In Experiment 1, where covariation between two variables was systematically manipulat...
متن کاملAssessing interactive causal influence.
The discovery of conjunctive causes--factors that act in concert to produce or prevent an effect--has been explained by purely covariational theories. Such theories assume that concomitant variations in observable events directly license causal inferences, without postulating the existence of unobservable causal relations. This article discusses problems with these theories, proposes a causal-p...
متن کاملThe Supposed Competition between Theories of Human Causal Inference
Newsome ((2003). The debate between current versions of covariation and mechanism approaches to causal inference. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 87–107.) recently published a critical review of psychological theories of human causal inference. In that review, he characterized covariation and mechanism theories, the two dominant theory types, as competing, and offered possible ways to integrate t...
متن کاملObservations vs. Interventions in Causal Induction: Heuristics in the Discrete and Continuous Paradigm Experiments
A descriptive model for covariation detection, the dual factor heuristic (DFH), has been proposed. While observation based covariation detection is an important initial stage of causal induction, intervention is indispensable to identify genuine causal links. An experiment examined DFH’s descriptive power in an environment where people manipulate causal events. DFH fit the data of the intervent...
متن کامل